Cone Beam CT Scanning for Dental Imaging

Print This Post

We recently posted an interview about Cone Beam CT Scanning. You can access the interview here by clicking here. In the Interview, the CEO of Imaging Sciences, stated that, “There are many advantages over traditional CT scans…The single most groundbreaking advantage of the i-CAT is easy, convenient and low-cost access to this imaging modality for the patient and the dentist. When this machine is in-office and the dentist has made the capital investment, superior and invaluable diagnostic information is produced for the patient whenever warranted, without the obstacles that forced compromises in the past.” What are you thoughts on Cone Beam CT Scanning as it relates to implant dentistry?

Free Daily Email Alert Click Here>>

Get OsseoNews.com Comments delivered daily! Click Here to subscribe.

22 Responses to “ Cone Beam CT Scanning for Dental Imaging ”

• Anonymous October 11th, 2005

  
  

  I heard there was a “per scan” option available instead of a full purchase.

• Anonymous October 11th, 2005

  
  

  As the technology changes, which it will, the per
  click makes a better choice and lower cost of
  ownership.

• Anonymous October 16th, 2005

  
  

  Clearly this technology is excellent and when indicated is appropriate. However, the company is attempting to foster the belief that office based Cone Beam CT Scanning is the new standard of care. This company has been very aggressive selling the technology. I believe it is inappropriate for dentists to allow corporate interests to establish or even infer that their new technology sets the standard of care for our patients.

• Anonymous October 18th, 2005

  
  

  I second the last comment. While it offers many advantages, but please don’t forget the increased radiation to patients (as compared to conventional radiology) and the tendency to over-rx the scan.

• Anonymous October 26th, 2005

  
  

  guy i went to a meeting and saw the iluma from imtec, this makes sense using it as a “pay per scan”.buying from Image life sciences is a no brainer. technology is at its fastest today as it has been in the past. I rather pay per scan than invest on an atari when tomorrow playstation will outperform in lower dose of radiation exposure and cost.

• Anonymous November 10th, 2005

  
  

  The J Morita Accuitomo has an effective dose of only 7.4 usieverts - the same as a panoramic scan. The image quality and resolution is better as well.

• Anonymous April 10th, 2006

  
  

  I do not believe that the Accuitomo by Morita is more accurate. The Iluma interested me because of the greater dynamic range for the same resolution. This would mean a much broader gray scale and substantial improvement in ability to discern structures and small changes.

• Anonymous May 17th, 2006

  
  

  At the AAOMR Meeting in Charleston, SC, and the AADMRT Meeting in Phoenix, AZ, back in 2005, Iluma/Imtec admitted that the scans they were displaying were taken on cadavers at a significantly higher radiation dosage than the unit is supposed to operate at. This calls into question the quality of the images that the end user can realistically expect to get with their system. I would try to contact clinics where they are actually using the Iluma system and see images taken on real patients before deciding to sign into a long-term agreement with them.

• Robert J. Miller May 24th, 2006

  
  

  In a study done by Dr. Mah at USC, they compared CT to CBCT and panorex. The exposure of CBCT is equivalent to panorex or less if taken in 6 inch field of view. There can be no rationalization NOT to use this technology when available. Becuase of the explosion of 3D scanners of ANY type, this has become the de facto standard of care. If you have an injury related to implant surgery, and this could have been avoided using volumetric scanning and an appropriate surgical guide, you will have NO defense in court.

• Anonymous August 12th, 2006

  
  

  I disagree. The “de facto standard of care “varies among communities and among states.

• Anonymous August 16th, 2006

  
  

  Are all dentists trained to read images? I think not. There is a specialty called Oral Radiology. I don’t think that everyone is in the capacity of diagnosing and reading images.
  A moral and ethical issue is raised here or is there something like pathologist placing implants?

• Anonymous September 14th, 2006

  
  

  The CT Scan will become the standard of care for mandibluar posterior implants and when ever sinus grafting is indicate. In addition, I believe, that virtual implant placement will eventually be the standard of care.

• Anonymous September 21st, 2006

  
  

  This is wonderful technology, but all medical CT scans are read by a radiologist. Who is reading these scans. Most dentists have no training in reading CT scans and they don’t even get to see the whole volume acquired. This is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

• Anonymous October 8th, 2006

  
  

  Yes, i agree a lawsuit waiting to happen…I send out to a facility for the CT and have the raw data read for a written report provided to me. Would I own a CT scanner when I could send the patients to a facility rather than take on the liability..you bet ya! patients also question a doctor owning his own scanner remember the problem with docs referring to their own MRI facility! I can not be a master of all trades!

• Anonymous October 9th, 2006

  
  

  I agree with law suit waiting to happen! We should not own a CT in our office, either a seperate llc or send out! I am not willing to take the chance of my practice being taken away in a law suit to clear $150.00 per patient for the scan!

• Anonymous December 14th, 2006

  
  

  I have just been informed that I am in violation of the stark law. I own a dental practice and an i-cat facility. I do refer patients to my facility but they pay cash, I do provide them with a receipt for them to submit to their insurance. If I move the scanner into my office what is the difference? I thought that this was strictly for med-care/caid patients? can I accept cash from the patients and not submit a bill to med-care/cade?

• Robert J. Miller December 19th, 2006

  
  

  I own a scan facility as well. One of the misconceptions about the Stark law is that you cannot send your patient to a scan facility that you own if it is off premises. If you apprise the patient that you have ownership in this facility, you can LEGALLY refer patient there. You are in violation only if you do not satisfy this requirement.

• tmk0427 May 10th, 2007

  
  

  I was wondering what happened with the lawsuit? It is my understanding as well that the Stark statute applies only to physicians who refer Medicare and Medicaid patients for specific services (”designated health services,” or DHS) to entities with which they (or an immediate family member) have a “financial relationship.” CT scanning apparently is a DHS and a DDS or DMD falls under the physician definition. What needs to be clarified is if you are referring non-medicaid/care patients do you still need to have the imaging center on premises or what is considered as in-office ancillary service? Additionally, if your referred patients are medicaid/care patients and you charge them cash at your CT business and they submit the expense to Medicaid/Care, would that be considered a Stark violation? If there are any health lawyers with dental degrees out there I’d be interested in getting your feedback on this issue? P.S. I’m not a doctor of any sort but am considering opening a CBCT imaging center with a few dental specialists as partners.

• EssDiag June 19th, 2007

  
  

  CBCT paired with software mapping systems undoubtedly offers an unparalleled level of preoperative planning. The price tag, apart from the financial, is near diagnostic quality evaluation/ visualization of soft tissues in an extremely anatomically dense region of real estate. This area needs to be carefully evaluated on each study. Early disease detection and intervention in this region can dramatically change morbidity and mortality.
  True as said above: there are the Stark statutes and state specific statutes some identical to Stark, some adding their own regulations some less specific.

• Elias Matta June 18th, 2008

  
  

  Hi,

  We have an imaging center in Mexico. We are looking itno purchasing a CBCT. The problem is that the only 2 machines registered at the Mexican Health Ministry are : Imtec Iluma and Sirona Gallileo.

  What can you please tell me about these machines.

  Thanks in advance

• daniellase June 19th, 2008

  
  

  There are many NewToms in Mexico also by AFP Imaging

• pmaloney13@sbcglobal.net September 6th, 2008

  
  

  My daugher has TMJ so severly that she cannot open her mouth and her teeth are crumbling. U of I hospital doctor told her to get a Cone Beam CT Scan so they could decide what they can do for her. She is on disability and Medicaid… so she cannot go out of Illinois for this test. Is there a hospital here that she could go to for the scan? Her and her husband are both disabled and cannot afford to pay an out of state hospital. She also has Chiari and a stent from her brain down to her stomach to release the build up of fluids which cause severe headaches. Please let me know if ther is a hospital in Illinois that she can go to. Thank you.

---

Leave a Comment

Note: Please refrain from ad hominem attacks, and promotional comments. Outside links are not permitted in comments. Though we require an email to route questionable comments to our editors, we will NEVER publish your email or use it for any other purpose. Thank you for your understanding.

Name (required)

Email (Required, Will NEVER be published)

Website

Note: At times your comment may not appear on the website immediately, because it has been sent to our editors for approval. Once approved, we will publish the comment. There is NO need to resubmit your comment, if it does not appear on the website immediately.

Mon September 08 2008

FREE Weekly Email

Keep current on the latest dental implant discussions! It's Free!

>>Click Here to Subscribe to OsseoNews.com Now!

---

---

Sponsor