Bovine Hydroxyapatite Vs. Pure Phase Beta Tricalcium Phosphate for Sinus Floor Augmentations in Dental Implant Surgery

Summary:


This study compares 2 different graft materials, bovine hydroxyapatite (BH) and pure phase beta tricalcium phosphate (TCP) associated with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in one patient referred for bilateral sinus augmentations and four dental implants.

Detailed Abstract:


BACKGROUND: Various techniques and many biomaterials are used in maxillary sinus floor augmentations.

PURPOSE: To compare 2 different graft materials, bovine hydroxyapatite (BH) and pure phase beta tricalcium phosphate (TCP) associated with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in one patient referred for bilateral sinus augmentations.

METHODS: Bilateral sinus augmentations were performed with BH mixed with PRP on one side and TCP with PRP on the other side. Biopsies were performed 6 months later and 4 dental implants were placed.

RESULTS: Wound healing was uneventful after both surgeries and the 4 dental implants were clinically successful. BH and TCP in combination with PRP led to a satisfactory increase in bone vertical dimension. The histomorphometric analysis showed differences in the number of lacunae and the proportion of fibrous tissue between both materials. Bone tissue showed a lamellar structure and a primary structure in the region grafted with TCP/PRP whereas it was exclusively primary structure on the side of BH/PRP.

CONCLUSION: BH and TCP have resulted in bone formation after the sinus lift procedures. Histomorphometric analysis showed some differences but both biomaterials allowed for stable clinical results. They deserve furthermore evaluation and comparison in large controlled studies and long-term histomorphometric examination.

Authors:

Antoun H, Bouk H, Ameur G.

Source:

Bilateral sinus graft with either bovine hydroxyapatite or beta tricalcium phosphate, in combination with platelet-rich plasma: a case report. Implant Dentistry. 2008 Sep;17(3):350-9.

Comments

Does not surprise me at

Does not surprise me at all...We all know from Piatelli's research and from our clinical studies that all biological materials work in the sinus.There is no clinical difference yet there are histological differences.BH will not resorb yet TCP,allografts and autogenous will remodel and eventually will turn into new bone formation.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.