Materialise´s Simplant Set To Expand?
Print This PostMaterialise is sure making waves. First there was a recent lawsuit against Nobel, and just about a week ago the company announced that Dentsply acquired a forty percent interest in Materialise Dental N.V., in a cash transaction of 20 million euros. The deal also paves the way for Dentsply to possibly acquire all of Materialise over time.
Mr. Gary Kunkle, DENTSPLY’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, stated, “We are excited about our investment in Materialise Dental which has a strong background of innovation in the dental, automation software and rapid prototyping industries.” “Materialise Dental inherits the technology and experience of Materialise, and joining forces with DENTSPLY will allow the company to expand further in the field of 3D Digital Dentistry and Dental CAD/CAM that can be broadly applied in many dental procedures,” says Bart Swaelens, Chief Executive Officer of Materialise Dental.
Any thoughts on how this new partnership between Dentsply and Materialise will effect other players in the implant software planning, and CAD/CAM markets? Could Sirona Dental Systems (Nasdaq: SIRO), fresh off its merger with Schick Technologies, soon be feeling some pressure? What about Nobel? Heliane Canepa, CEO of Nobel, recently claimed that NobelGuide does ‘not violate patents of Materialise’ and the lawsuit filed against it by the Belgium group is ‘unjustified,’. How else could this deal between Dentsply and Materialise change the dental technology landscape?
About Materialise
Materialise Dental´s Simplant tools enable implantologists and oral surgeons to scientifically plan dental implant surgery on an interactive basis. Materialise Dental also offers a customized drill guide product under the brand name SurgiGuide which can be used by implantologists or oral surgeons during the implant procedure to ensure accurate implant placement. Materialise Dental holds numerous patents related to preparation of
medical models, including dental implant drilling guides, using CT
scans and rapid prototyping.
Free Daily Email Alert Click Here>>
Get OsseoNews.com Comments delivered daily! Click Here to subscribe.FREE Weekly Email
Keep current on the latest dental implant discussions! It's Free!
>>Click Here to Subscribe to OsseoNews.com Now!
-
Editor Picks
-
Popular Posts
-
Hot Topics
- Large Defect in the Labial Cortical Plate
- Abutment Screw Gets Stuck: How to Prevent This?
- Crown 1mm Short of the Margin: Recommendations?
- Suture Lost Exposing the Implant: What to Do?
- Mini Implants in Anterior Mandible: Expectations of Longevity?
- Space Between Implant Fixture and Natural Teeth: How Much Is Enough?
- Bucco-Lingual Resorption Exposing the Threads on Implants: How to Manage?
- Platform Switching: Which Implants are Designed for This?
- Options for Provisional Restoration?
- Porcelain Fractures: How To Approach?
- Loose Bio-Oss Particles: Can Implants Be Placed?
- Maxillary Overdentures: What Implant Support is Required?
- Mixing Metronidazole Solution in Grafting Material?
- Sinus Lift Complication after using Summer’s Osteotome Technique?
- Cone Beam vs. Conventional CT Scans: Radiation Levels?
- Sinus Tear: How Long to Wait for Regraft?
- Mini Implants for Long-Term Use?
- How to Avoid Hitting the Mental Foramen Nerve?
- Best Technique for Removing Osseointegrated Implants?
- Fosamax and Dental Implant Treatment
Implant Courses
>>More Implant Courses

6 Responses to “ Materialise´s Simplant Set To Expand? ”
What we need is a physiological attachment between bone and implant. Including the natural build of a “periodontal membrane” so that forces/ stress that is imposed onto the implant is absorbed, and not directed at the bone alone. BMP-2 is a sine qua non for this, but so are new materials.
One thing is certain about the Future of Dental Implant: If you don’t adapt, you may not be part of that Future–“3D Image-Guided Computer-Aided Implant Surgery”. It may become untenable to place implants in the next year without Pre-operative planning using 3D CT scan.
I agree that Dental CT scan is a helpful diagnostic tool…. but standard of care???
Excellent to have different 3D options.
Well, we don’t expect critics to a 3D Image-Guided Surgery from a Radio Diagnostic Center….
BMP-2? Which was the topic?
I just jumped on the 3-D CT bandwagon. I year ago I argued that it is not the standard of care. I still believe that to be true primarily because of the prohibitive cost of these units to a lot of practices. However, having seen the capabilities and, most imprtantly the benefits to patients, I do believe it is a matter of time before they will be considered the standard of care. In 5-10 years it will be the only way of doing implant therapy. However, before that time there will need to be some industry consolidation, standardization, and a decline in prices.
Leave a Comment
Note: Please refrain from ad hominem attacks, and promotional comments. Outside links are not permitted in comments. Though we require an email to route questionable comments to our editors, we will NEVER publish your email or use it for any other purpose. Thank you for your understanding.
Note: At times your comment may not appear on the website immediately, because it has been sent to our editors for approval. Once approved, we will publish the comment. There is NO need to resubmit your comment, if it does not appear on the website immediately.