Dr. S. asks:

I have a female patient who has just successfully been treated for second stage breast cancer. She completed surgery, radiation and chemotherapy 6 months ago. She needs extractions, bone grafts with immediate implant placement in her maxillary anterior and an immediate implant supported provisional anterior bridge. She is otherwise healthy and in good shape. I need to know whether she is a good case for bone graft, immediate implant with immediate temporary bridge.








Featured Courses
>>More Online Implant Courses

Cone Beam Technology: Placing Dental Implants with Confidence
In this webinar, Dr. Myers will discuss the clinical and diagnostic benefits of incorporating 3-D into the dental practice and 3-D's compatibility with guided surgery applications, as well as the communication and marketing benefits...
>>Learn More and Register Now!

8 Responses to “ Treatment Plan for Breast Cancer Patient? ”

  • John Clark April 2nd, 2008

    Advice to me from a Max/Fax friend is that this scenario is not normally an issue provided the jaw was clear of the field of radiation (which is normally the case). Naturally, you need to confirm this was the case with your patient before proceeding. I’d probably do a blood work-up as well to confirm the cytology is normal.

  • Bob April 2nd, 2008

    From my experience with two comparable patients I recommend to ask about the use of bisphosphonates. They are not only used in cases with metastatic bone cancer, they are as well used as part of a preventive strategy after initial treatment. Whereas the first group receives an almost monthly infusion the second group receives quarterly or less infusions of zolendronate ( Brand Name “Zometa”). It is still unclear how to properly define ONJ risks for each group but written consent about that topic is mandatory.
    AAOMS and Bone-Societys have issued guidelines.

  • Dr. Mehdi Jafari April 3rd, 2008

    The real problem with the lady having a past medical history of breast cancer lies not only within the current health situation or blood morpholgy,but also in the list of the drugs which are prescribed for her.Most of these patients are lumpectomized or mastectomized or even radiated, however, a high percentage of them receive another adjuvant of treatment modality called “hormon therapy” as well.
    Hormone (blocking) therapy is often used to treat women whose cancers are sensitive to hormones .It can also be used to decrease the probability of cancer recurrence and if the cancer has already metastasized, hormone therapy may inhibit and controls its further seeding and growth.So far, two groups of drugs are being used in this treatment modality.
    1): Selective estrogen receptor modulators (Tamoxifen) are used to treat the women with hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer. Unfortunately, it includes some serious side effects like thrombogenesis and endometrial neoplasia.
    2):Aromatase inhibitors that block the conversion of a hormonal substance (androstenedione) into estrogen, which effectively inhibits estrogen production in cells other than the ovaries.However,the major problem with aromatase inhibitors is an increased risk of osteoporosis.This osteoporotic condition which in some cases may be severe, can be a real challenge in the course of implant therapy.Bisphosphonates prescribed for the patients seem rational, mostly to deal with this osteoporosis rather than the bony metastasis of the breast neoplasia.

  • Dr. S. April 4th, 2008

    Thanks for the responses dear doctors! My patient under went chemotherapy and radiation in Nov/Dec. She lost lot of hair on the scalp during this period and has to wear a wig. To add to her misery her upper anterior bridge keeps coming off every 2 weeks, and both of us were contemplating implants. Could a few more doctors join in the discussion?

    Dr Mehdi thorough as ususal! Where would osseo news be without you?

  • dr. khawer April 14th, 2008

    as far as bone is clear and no further radiation is required , there is no harm for implants.

  • JBM April 15th, 2008

    Exciting case and implants certainly are an option. Having treated head and neck cancer (both primary and metastatic) I have a few comments on treatment planning.

    Firstly, I think you have done and will continue to keep up to date on the medical history, especially medication use (as in previous comments). Second, if no other contraindications exist, I would contact the radiation oncologist and ask for the “port films” or “port diagrams”. These will define the boundries of the radiation. Ask for total dose and how fractionated. Since radiation effects are cumulative and do not decrease with time, this needs to be done for ALL her radiation exposures in the past. You will be able to take this information and document her area of exposure. In addition, a complete radiographic and clinical exam should be completed to exclude metastatic disease to the head and neck.

    There are some good studies in progress and published about placement of implants into irratdiated mandibles. If the ports extend to the mandible, hyperbaric oxygen treatments can be explored.

    Minimal flaps and excellent tissue handling are a must. Mini implants are another option. Lots to consider.

  • op April 19th, 2008

    The proposed surgical site for your implants is away from the primary site of radiation, no risk for ORN , If your patient received bisphosphonate therapy as complement to the cancer theraphy, may be a good idea to get a CTX test to get a relative value and asses the risk of bisphosphonate induced osteonecrosis, as far as chemotheraphy, I would consult when the treatment is going to conclude and monitor CBC count until patient is no longer neutropaenic or thrombocytopaenic .
    wish you the best of success.

  • Dr S. May 18th, 2008

    Thank you Drs Khawer,JBM,op. I shall keep the forum posted of any details as and when they are available to me.

    Incidentally her “regularly treating physician” has asked me to keep away from implants for the lady for atleast a 10 months to a year as her breast tumour biopsy report had been reported as “second stage” and he would want to re-evalaute her at that time to check out for recurrence and metastasis.

    Thank you for keeping the discussion thread alive. i shall keep all of you informed.


Leave a Comment

Comment Guidelines: This is a forum for dentists for intelligent discussion. No insults. No outside links. No promotional comments. Though we require an email to route questionable comments to our editors, we will NEVER publish your email. Consumers & Patients: Please do NOT post dental questions here. Instead Visit ChooseDentalImplants.com to get Expert Advice for Implants.


Note: At times your comment may not appear on the website immediately, because it has been sent to our editors for approval. Once approved, we will publish the comment. There is NO need to resubmit your comment, if it does not appear on the website immediately.