Digital vs. Conventional Implant Impressions: What do you prefer?

When it comes to implant impression techniques, is digital intraoral scanning (IOS) more efficient than the the conventional method? And which technique is more difficult to apply? This interesting question was the subject of a recent randomized controlled trial to analyze implant impression techniques applying intraoral scanning (IOS) and the conventional method according to time efficiency, difficulty, and operator’s preference.1

The study concluded:

For single-implant sites, the quadrant-like intraoral scanning (IOS) was more time efficient than the conventional full-arch impression technique in a phantom head simulating standardized optimal conditions. A high level of acceptance for IOS was observed among students and dentists. (76% of the students preferred IOS, 48% of the dentists were favoring conventional impressions, and 26% each IOS and either technique.)1

What has been your experience when comparing the efficiency and difficulty between digital and conventional, and what is your preference?

Read the Full Abstract Here

1. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep 5. Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator’s preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial.
.Joda T, et al.



2 thoughts on “Digital vs. Conventional Implant Impressions: What do you prefer?

  1. Matt Friedman says:

    We prefer digital IOS to conventional impression techniques. Having the ability to see the preparation/s immediately and the ability to modify the preparation and easily fill in scan data is much more efficient than retaking of conventional impressions.

    There is also elimination of potential inaccuracies that can arise from conventional impression material such as incorrect mixing of parts, to patient movement during setting of the material as well as other potential problems during pouring of these types of impressions.

    We have found the fit of all of our restorations to be just as good if not better than when we were using traditional impression techniques (we were using polyether material).

    (0)
  2. Carlos Boudet, DDS DICOI says:

    These past couple of years have brought significant improvements in the hardware, software and speed of the available intraoral scanner systems.
    You still may have some limitations depending on the implant system you use and whether there is software available for it, but the advantages of the digital impression protocol are many and trump the conventional impressions in many ways.
    A new example of the efficiency of the systems is explained in my article published by Chairside magazine this year. The article is available online here:
    http://glidewelldental.com/education/chairside-dental-magazine/volume-11-issue-1/digital-scanning-implants-win-win-gp-specialist-patient-alike/
    I encourage everyone to get some hand-on exposure to this technology and see if it fits your practice.

    (0)

Comments are closed.

Posted in Research and News, Restorative.
Bookmark Digital vs. Conventional Implant Impressions: What do you prefer?

Videos to Watch:

Lateral Sinus Lift: Perforation, Repair, and Implants

These two videos demonstrate the lateral window sinus technique, and implant placement following the repair[...]

Watch Now!
Single Tooth Replacement with Implants in the Esthetic Zone

Dr. Jack Hahn provides tips and reviews cases for implant placement in the esthetic zone.[...]

Watch Now!
Surgical Consideration for the Flapless Approach

In this video, Dr. Jack Hahn discusses and presents cases to review the surgical considerations[...]

Watch Now!
Bond Apatite: Socket Preservation Cases

These 2 videos show the use of Bond Apatite in socket preservation cases, one with[...]

Watch Now!
3D Guided Implant Placement

The placement of multiple implants in this case was helped thru the use of 3d[...]

Watch Now!
Ridge Splitting Cases in Narrow Alveolar ridge

This videos shows ridge splitting, which when combined with bone expansion, is an effective technique[...]

Watch Now!
Placement of 4 Implants and Cement-Retained Bridge

The treatment plan was to extract the lower incisors, canines, and lower premolar and place[...]

Watch Now!
Failing Bridge Replaced with Dental Implant Supported Bridge

Ahe patient presented with a failed dental bridge from the upper right canine to the[...]

Watch Now!
Lateral Sinus Augmentation with CGF

Following membrane elevation with the lateral approach, and confirmation of an intact sinus membrane, concentrated[...]

Watch Now!
Titanium Mesh for Ridge Augmentation

The use of titanium mesh is a reliable method for ridge augmentation to provide adequate[...]

2 Comments

Watch Now!
Implant Grafting Techniques: Demineralized Sponge Strip and Tunneling

This video reviews several unique grafting and surgical techniques, including the use of demineralized cancellous[...]

Watch Now!
Mandibular Fixed Screw Retained Restoration

This video shows the use of a surgical guide for a mandibular fixed screw retained[...]

1 Comment

Watch Now!