Dental Implants: Overdentures with ERA Attachments

Print This Post

Dr. Gold asks us:
I have been making overdentures with ERA attachments.

I have heard a lot of positive comments about Locator and ERA-VKS SG attachments.  Have any of you used these for your dental implant supported overdenture cases?  What are the other alternatives? Is there anything specific to watch out for? Also I am looking for a dental implant system that be used for removable partial
dentures. Any suggestions or comments?

Free Daily Email Alert Click Here>>

Get OsseoNews.com Comments delivered daily! Click Here to subscribe.

12 Responses to “ Dental Implants: Overdentures with ERA Attachments ”

• Anonymous February 13th, 2006

  
  

  Locator is a better version of the ERA. Lower vertical height and more durable. Just be careful to use the white spacer rings to block the undercuts if you are picking up the attachments chairside. Also work well with partials. I use 3i, you can order the Locator abutments from them directly.

• Mark Jacobson, DDS February 14th, 2006

  
  

  I called SternGold today and they made some good arguements why an ERA attachment is superior to locators. They claimed the ERA wears much better.

• Dr. R Mosery February 14th, 2006

  
  

  The zest locator is an excellent attachment. Its ease of use ,chairside insertion etc. makes it far superior to the era.As noted above the white blockout gaskets are key. You will never go back to era. Changing the nylon retainers are a breeze as well.On a similar note i would like to mention that in the question you stated that the overdentures are implant supported. Overdentures should be implant retained. The surrounding structures should be what’s supporting the od. this is not semantics its physics, follow the basics and extend your case accordingly.They’ll require much less maintainence and be more sucessful.

• David Mulherin February 14th, 2006

  
  

  As an OMFS I see patients returning from restorative dentists with various attachments. The Locator is a great attachment for the patient but expensive. O-rings work well and are cheaper and easy but require some maintainence or teach patients to change O rings.

• David Mulherin February 14th, 2006

  
  

  I’ve seen and used a lot of implant systems. I assume you are a GP and plan to place and restore? Look at Biohorizons internal or external connection and free abutment. The abutment doubles as the fixture mount and preppable/cementable C&B abutment either temporarily or 90% of the time it is the final abutment. Cost $259

• Taylor Delleney February 14th, 2006

  
  

  I am an implant rep. I have seen many cases with different attachments. I must say the Locator abutment is far superior to any overdenture attachment on the market today. It is 1.68mm shorter than the ERA and the color-coded snap rings are simple and predictable. The Locator 56,000 cycles, Sterngold ERA 2,000. I will give you the study to back it up. O-ring, ERA, Locator. You decide, good, better, best.

• LCM February 15th, 2006

  
  

  Yes, please do post the study here, thanks.

• Nicholas Varras, CDT February 15th, 2006

  
  

  As a dental technician, I have seen many cases, both with the ERA and the Locator. First, with the micro size, the ERA is the same height as the Locator and almost 2mm narrower. As far as function and durability, they both perform well as long as the implants are parallel. With divergent implants the ERA performs much better due to it’s angle correction capability. I have found that the ERA is the only overdenture abutment on the market that is capable of properly correcting divergent implants while maintaining vertical resiliency. I have personally switched over several cases from Locators to ERA’s because of this and have seen improved performance and patient satisfaction.

• Bruce Seavey, Design Engineer February 15th, 2006

  
  

  An important difference is that the ERA is resilient and the Locator is not if the implants are at all off angled. As soon as the Locator has to pivot to try to deal with even a small angle, all of the tiny amount of vertical movement is gone and now you are dealing with a non-resilient attachment. As mentioned before, the overdenture should implant retained. Without resiliency, most of the forces are placed directly on the implant, which is not the ideal situation. Resiliency allows the forces to be directed more toward the tissue and away from the implant.

• yianni February 15th, 2006

  
  

  You can use O-rings but you need adequate height between upper and lower ridge and you may have to perform alveoloctomy to gain that. The height of the ball atttachment is about 7mm. Then you need space for the acrylic, metal substructure and teeth. They are simple but not forgiving if you have more than 1 non parallel implant or not enough interocclusal space .Changing the o-ring is easy and inexpensive. I would examine the patient, space, retention required, number of implants,location of implants in the arch,arch form, A-P spread etch

• Scott Mullaly March 29th, 2006

  
  

  This topic has spread across the internet over the past 5 years. With almost all views positive for the Locator from users who have used the o-rings ERA’s and Locators.
  B,Seavey (Sterngold) points out the difference between the Locator and the ERA as being the resiliency of the male in the cap. His views on this are WRONG. The Locator male is always picked up in line with the abutment. If the abutment is off 10 degree’s the male is in line with that 10 degree’s.
  That means that the male will pivot 8 degrees off of that ten. In reality we found that with two Locators the actual movement needed is more like 4 degrees. Zest Anchors did a survey of Locator users who have also used the ERA, in about 200 replys only one chose the ERA over the Locator.
  Scott Zest Anchors.

• Joe Buttacavoli May 16th, 2006

  
  

  Been placing implants since 1981, & using ERA since they came out with them as abutments. Have had great success with them. Easy to use, easy to change when needed. Over the years I have changed many overdenture cases to ERAs for various reasons making many satisfied and comfortable patients. After all isn’t that why we do this? Different things work well in different hands. That does not mean one is better than the other. It is a matter of being comfortable with what you use.

---

Leave a Comment

Note: Please refrain from ad hominem attacks, and promotional comments. Outside links are not permitted in comments. Though we require an email to route questionable comments to our editors, we will NEVER publish your email or use it for any other purpose. Thank you for your understanding.

Name (required)

Email (Required, Will NEVER be published)

Website

Note: At times your comment may not appear on the website immediately, because it has been sent to our editors for approval. Once approved, we will publish the comment. There is NO need to resubmit your comment, if it does not appear on the website immediately.

Thu August 07 2008

FREE Weekly Email

Keep current on the latest dental implant discussions! It's Free!

>>Click Here to Subscribe to OsseoNews.com Now!

---

---

Sponsor