Anon. asks:
I placed one implant on the #13 site [maxillary left second premolar] but underestimated how far from the maxillary first premolar I should have drilled the pilot hole. When I realized that I was 1mm away from the root of the maxillary first premolar [#12], I tried to reorient the pilot drill and drill again. But even after this attempt at correction, the implant fixture is too close to the root of the adjacent natural tooth. If I leave the implant fixture as is, will it osseointegrate? Or should I remove it, bone graft and try again, this time, not so close to the adjacent tooth. I think the root of the first premolar curves and I did not realize this in studying the per-operative radiographs. Any thoughts>

Have an Implant Question?
>>Ask Us Now!

Free Daily Email Alert Click Here>>

Get OsseoNews.com Comments delivered daily! Click Here to subscribe.

22 Responses to “ Implant Fixture Too Close to Root of Adjacent Tooth: Will it Osseointegrate? ”

  • UW Perio August 25th, 2008

    The implant will most likely integrate. The questions you should ask are: Is it restorable and will the premolar require endo down the road?

  • charles Schlesinger, DDS August 25th, 2008

    In a ddition to what was pointed out above, if you are left with less than 1.5mm of bone between the implant platform and the adjacent tooth you can expect a loss of bone between your implant and natural tooth which will result in the loss of the papilla. Did you take a check film after you drilled your pilot hole? That should have given you some indication that you were may have been too close.

  • Neda-Moslemi August 26th, 2008

    I agree with UW Perio.
    If the distance between implant fixture and adjacent tooth is sufficient in coronal part, do not worry about implant clinical sucess, but endodontic treatment will be probably required. Please follow your patient and test the vitality of the first premolar tooth once a week and do RCT whenever you find it non-vital.
    If the entire length of the fixture is too close to the root, implant removal is recommended because it will not be restorable even if it is clinically fixed.
    Is the postoperative radiograph available?

  • RIk August 26th, 2008

    I agree with all the above comments and also wanted to add that even in simple cases like this, a Cone Beam CT might have given you a better mental picture as to where the adjacent root was going and might have influenced your initial trajectory…
    Rik

  • Bruce G Knecht August 26th, 2008

    It is hard for us to comment without seeing a PA. Another thing that needs to be seen is the depth of implant placement to the CEJ of the adjacent tooth. A good idea is to take an impression of the implant before it intergrates, and have a lab PEEK aboutment and temp made and see if a papilla can form. The stone model will give you the best perspective if this will work or not and you will know with the tissue healin in a month if it will be a doable thing. Good luck.

  • Dr.Rajesh Bhatia August 26th, 2008

    We had a similar case where we placed a implant at the site of #14 very close to the roots of #15.It healed remarkably well.So leave it .Just explain the pt. that he might hv to get the next tooth endo. treated

  • Chan Joon Yee August 27th, 2008

    I think a perio problem would be far more likely than an endo problem.

  • Juan F. Aragon August 27th, 2008

    What its the reason to do an endodontic treatment in cases like this?

    Thanks

  • dr ACatic August 27th, 2008

    Unfortunately I had the same problem about a year ago involving implant in position 35 (lower left second premolar) placed in the apical part cca 0.8-1mm to the apex of the tooth 34 (lower left first premolar). I must have injured blood supply to the 34 and about 2 weeks postop I had to do the endo on 34. At the CEJ the tooth-impl space was 1.8mm and no problems later. Didn’t do the post-pilot drill x-ray due to faulty equipment at the time. Needless to add, don’t do a thing without it afterwords.

  • Dan Holtzclaw, DDS, MS August 27th, 2008

    You need to consider a few things.

    1. Platform location. If the platform is too close to the adjacent tooth, you will have restorative problems and you will lose the papilla. Another factor to consider is the platform relationship to the adjacent CEJ’s. If it is too coronal, you will have restorative problems. If it is too apical, you may end up with periodontal problems down the road.
    2. Apical location. If the apical portion of the implant is too close to the root, you will probably be ok so long as the implant is not grossly penetrating the adjacent root. I would monitor the adjacent tooth for any signs of pulpal pathosis. If any develop, an RCT may be indicated.
    3. Sure, a cone beam CT may give you a better idea of the site anatomy, but I feel that is overkill for a single implant site unless you had concerns about osseous anatomy (ie. ridge width or undercut), pneumatized maxillary sinus, or if you were worried about IAN proximity. It sounds like your problem began with the pilot hole placement. Did you have a surgical stent? This would have likely eliminated your pilot hole location error. If you are new to implants, a surgical stent is highly recommended. It takes many many implant placements to develop an “eye” for placement without a surgical stent as you must consider multiple angles (buccal/lingual, mesial/distal, apical/coronal) in addition to monitoring vital structures. Even with the most experienced surgeons, placement without a stent sometimes results in less than ideal implant placement.

  • satish joshi August 27th, 2008

    Best solution is to remove implant before it integrates,graft the site and and wait for 4 months to place another one,if you really want to provide better service to your patient.Any thing else would be a compromise restoratively,esthetically,and functionally.Future perio and/or endo(adjacent tooth) problems are real possibility which may lead to implant failure.Apart from not using a surgical stent,this kind of problem may arise some times due to dull drills following old socket walls with two maxillary bicuspids’s roots in close proximity and not letting you drill in proper direction.
    Good luck.

  • Dr.Serge August 27th, 2008

    i got something similar sometime ago…i placed a second molar implant and the body of the implant was touched the distal root of the first molar, the implant was coronally 3mm away from the implant but the distal root was going distally with a big convexity, soo part of the implant touched part of the tooth but fortunately with no problems…
    i hope yours also won’t have any problem…

  • Dr.Behnam August 27th, 2008

    hi,
    if the adjucent root is not touched by fixture of new implant and if the
    signs of vitality od the natural tooth is positive,i think nothing should be done,esthetic problems can be resolved at the time of prosthetic phase,and remember that integration will be enough at least in 3 parts of four walls of your implant .so if the initial stabilisation is good and after 4-6 weeks post operative signs are normal let the paitent free from the stress of a new surgery,good luck

  • R. Hughes August 27th, 2008

    The best way to treat this is to replace the implant in the proper position. Thus,catch it asap and avoid the later issues. I am sure this has happened to alot of us. It has to me, and it’s a hard lesson. Even with a good guide it can happen. It does yield aesthetic issues. So try to catch this problem at placement surgery and correct. You most likely will have to us a graft material resorbable and or nonresorbable! Like I stated earlier, this has happened to alot of us, so don’t beat yourself to death, learn from it. Have your assistants help you with angulation and use the guide pins, abutments etc. depending on the system one is using.

  • Peter Fairbairn August 28th, 2008

    After 17 years of placing I still always take a pilot bur radiograph at 3mm to check angulation and am amazed how many times a correction is required. You can never know all the time like flying in a cloud.

  • Clark T. Barco August 28th, 2008

    I saw a case similar to this several years ago where the adjacent tooth was touched by the drill. It took 3 years — after endodontic and periodontic treatments – for the tooth that was “violated” to be eventually lost. As mentioned, the roots curve, and fixtures are straight — aligning the stint only with the clinical crowns can, with certian cases, be very deceiving. (See review in J Periodontol Vol 79, No. 8, Aug 2008, page 1324 — for a similar case.)

    That’s why we too take an intra-operative radiograph to check our direction (similar to Dr. Fairbairn, but at 5 mm for us) — it’s kept us out of a lot of troubles!

    Also, the more we do 3-D imaging, the better we like it.

  • Dr.Rajesh Bhatia August 28th, 2008

    Actually even if the osseointegration occurs the real problem is crown placement.Thanks

  • eric wallace August 30th, 2008

    Dr. Joshi has spoken the ultimate wisdom. Take the fixture out, graft, and do it better next time. It is so much easier to fix the problem now than get involved in endo, perio defects, long, painfull discussions. Your fixture will integrate, but then you are stuck with it. It took me a long time and thousands of successful implants and many not-so-succesful ones to realize this, but it is really the best thing you can do. Take it out, ASAP. Be honest with the patient, and plan better next time.

  • Dr. J September 2nd, 2008

    Remove the implant right away. The implant will likely be fime but once you place the crown on the implant the bone loss will advance done the root of the natural tooth to where the tooth to implant distance is more than 2 mm. This problem will not happen for a year or so but it will happen. Papilla loss etc as also another problem.

  • dr.e September 2nd, 2008

    I agree with taking radiographs to check the direction of your pilot drill. Even when you have a lab made surgical stent ,which is made only considering the shape of the crown and not the shape of the root, you can still get very close or hit the adjacent root. Once this happens you are violating the PDL space and you will have perio and/or endo problems.

    This could be used against you in the court, since it could have been an avoidable situation.

    So I recommend, taking check radiographs even if you have a surgical guide.

  • Dr Delendas September 3rd, 2008

    This incidence gives us a nice opportunity to comment on the importance of periapical X-rays before insertion of an implant, especially when this is done adjacent to a tooth.
    The main reason is that panoramic x-rays sometimes do not reveal clearly the apical portion of a tooth, which may curve distally or mesially or may present with a periapical pathosis,that could harm the implant in the future.This is especially true for canines.
    So do not underestimate the power of a simple periapical X-ray.

  • sherif hayati September 7th, 2008

    it happened to my twice may be a year ago,surprisingly i got away with it the first time when a maxillary second premolar was injured while drilling a first premolar implant it went ok even the prosthetics. the second time it wasnt that smooth as epical root resorption occured and i mhad to sacrifice the tooth ,so again ,intraoperative xrays and preoperative 3D is realy usefull.


Leave a Comment

Note: Please refrain from ad hominem attacks, and promotional comments. Outside links are not permitted in comments. Though we require an email to route questionable comments to our editors, we will NEVER publish your email or use it for any other purpose. Thank you for your understanding.


Note: At times your comment may not appear on the website immediately, because it has been sent to our editors for approval. Once approved, we will publish the comment. There is NO need to resubmit your comment, if it does not appear on the website immediately.