• Home
• Advice
• New! FREE Webinars
• Products
• Courses
• Online CE
• Videos

>>Advertise

NobelSmile

posted in Nobel Biocare, Dental Implant News

« Shorter Dental Implants ? | Dental Implants in a Cleft Palate »

Print This Post

Can Nobel Biocare finally smile again? Last week Sweden’s Medical Products Agency (MPA) gave Nobel the green light to continue selling its NobelDirect and NobelPerfect implants. The condition is simply that Nobel Biocare must rewrite instructions for the NobelDirect
and NobelPerfect dental implants to inform customers and dentists of a
possible bone loss problem and how to prevent it, the Swedish Medical
Products Agency said. The company must explain by Jan. 8, 2007
how it plans to rewrite the instructions and cannot market the
product until the new information is available.

Reaction to the MPA rulling was unquestionably positive. “Without a product withdrawal, we believe many of the potential material risks have been avoided,'’ Michael Jungling, an analyst at Merrill Lynch, said in a report. As a result, it’s unlikely that Nobel Biocare “will face U.S. litigation or that its customer reputation will be tarnished.”

However, it is important to note that a ban of the product is still possible. “We just don’t have enough data to pull the product off the
market at the moment,'’ Lennart Philipson, the agency’s director
for medical devices, said at a press conference in Uppsala,
Sweden. The shortcomings in the instructions could explain the
increased risk of a breakdown of the jawbone, the agency said.

What are your thoughts on this latest twist in Nobel saga? Has fortune once again smiled upon Nobel?

14 Responses to “ NobelSmile ”

• mac December 12th, 2006

  
  

  1) One-part implants have been used for many decades. It seems that NOBEL has simply forgotten the clinical procedures how to apply them successfully.
  2) The recommended protocol is cleraly insufficient.
  3) NOBEL Direct is obviously more a marketing thing than a clinical concept fitting NOBEL’s product / knowledge concept and portfolio.
  4) I found thier communications during this event rather weak and unprofessional - not what I would expect from the market leader.

• TD December 13th, 2006

  
  

  Is there Nobel Direct and Nobel Perfect the only two Nobel implants with bone loss concerns?

  What about the other Nobel implants like the TiUnite?

  Any dentists experience bone loss with the TiUnite?

• Doc Albert December 13th, 2006

  
  

  I love the Groovy implants - that one rabbit study really gives me confidence…

• Anonymous December 14th, 2006

  
  

  “that one rabbit study…”

  Enough said

• Sergio Callamand December 15th, 2006

  
  

  The Ti Unite surface is the gold standard surface in implant dentistry. Huge evidence

• TD December 15th, 2006

  
  

  Anyone finding a bacterial microgap problem (ie boneloss) with the TiUnite?

• DL McGraw December 15th, 2006

  
  

  “The Ti Unite surface is the gold standard surface in implant dentistry. Huge evidence”

  I would challenge that on so many levels. The first being that there is not “huge evidence” directly comparing different surfaces.

  On what basis is TiUnite better than any other surface?

• Simon December 15th, 2006

  
  

  Getting back to the Nobel Direct issue that this thread started with.

  What Nobel is being called on - quite rightly- is the fact that when Nobel Direct was launched, they pitched it as the answer for inexperienced surgeons and promoted a flapless surgery. I remember because I still have the flyer and the letter from them.

  Most of the cases in the Direct clinical trials were done with a flap, by experts. Now they’re saying that it’s really an implant for experienced users.

  So it all comes down to, “Can I trust what Nobel’s marketing is telling me?” I know, like any other company, they want to sell product. I don’t mind marketing. But there’s a big difference between making a splash and making false claims about a product.

  Go to Nobel’s website and you’ll see all sorts of new claims: Beautiful teeth NOW; Soft tissue integration, groovy, immediate function. All of these claims are based on paper thin evidence.

  As mentioned above by ‘Doc Albert’ the whole basis for the claims of the “Groovy” implants is one rabbit study. I’m supposed to confidently offer immediate function to my patients based on one rabbit study? And that’s on their own website!!

  I hope my fellow dentitsts will at least acknowledge these distortions, just as the Swedish agency has.

• Anonymous December 15th, 2006

  
  

  Anyone who proclaims the tiunite as being the golden standard is ignorant.
  I have used the groovy and the nobel direct with variable results. I dont feel these implants are as versatile as they have been marketed.
  More long term multicentred un biased studies are required with less company backed pseudo scientific studies.

• Jerry Niznick December 22nd, 2006

  
  

  Lets recall all the Gold Standards Nobel has claimed over the years and where they are now:
  1) Branemark Machined Surface (remember high failures in soft bone because it was too smooth). Nobel claimed it was covered by a Branemark Pit Patent…but that was declared invalid by fraud by the US Federal Court of Appeals after Nobel lost its patent suit against 3i. Nobel did effectively push the price of its competitors’ implants up with this type of frivilous litigation.
  2) Pure Titanium (remember high number of fractures)
  3) External Hex (remember screw lossening and bacterial purculation from gapping margins)
  4) Nobel Perfect with the speed bumps preserving interproximal bone and thus the papilla…. that didn’t turn out to be true
  5) NobelDirect being so simple anyone could place them with guaranteed success (that was one of the statements Nobel can no longer say because of bone loss)
  6) Tiunite…invented by Nobel.. infact Ticer Implants in the 1980s had this surface.
  7 And the biggest lie of them all…. Branemark discovered osseointegration. The fact is that Branemark’s 1977 book acknowledged a French Orthopedist named Levinthal as the first to report on bone bonding to titanium but then conveniently forgot that when the marketing started. I sued Nobel for false advertising in the late 1980’s and for a while they changed to saying Branemark “observed” osseointegration, but then went back to the big lie in their literature and again credited Branemark.
  Finally, here is a little lie that many may not know about. The SEM (Albrektsson JPD Article 1983) colorized for use in Nobel’s marketing literature claiming it represented an osteoblast with its cell processes exteding over a titanium implant in the upper jaw, turned out to be the same SEM from a 1981 Albrektsson article referred to as a fibroblast from skin around the ear implant. So much for Albrektsson’s credibility as he now speaks for Astra claiming indignation at Nobel’s failure to research the NobelDirect.

• omfs February 22nd, 2007

  
  

  The nobel direct and nobel perfect are a joke. Once they run out of product they won’t be offered anymore. I told my nobelbiocare rep that when they first came out.

• dana February 15th, 2008

  
  

  had hip bone graft surgery -healed very well - a few mos later 12 3i certain taper implants installed at the same time oral surgeon performed a face % brow lift. 5 implants failed. Oral surgeon replace with 5 different implants. 4 failed. Now leaving me with 8 and only implant #14 on the left side. I complained that #14 was sensitive - however he said all was ok. He also recharged me for the surgeries. Total cost $50,000. The final permenant prostesthes installed ($25,000) and the # implant 14 gum tissue flared up within days. Oral surgeon planted an antibiotic in the area. Said I had implantitis. There were other issues in the 3 yr ongoing saga - such as old stithes found in gum area around #14. Surgeon said that my infection went all the way to the sinus and stopped just short of going thru. Another time my face swolled so much that my eyes almost shut after I believe the failed implant removal. Had to have extra strong antibiotics. Infection cleared. Now another surgeon suggested maybe a tissue graft from the roof of my mouth to the gum which has detatached from the implant 14 area - or - take antibiotics for the rest of my life! My prothedontist feels that we should wait it out and see what happens - as I am not in pain except when I use the water pic. Advice and comments much appreciated.

• BW May 10th, 2009

  
  

  Nobel really knows how to market their product and is selling to everyone with a license regadless of experience. Hence the decline of successful implant placement over the recent years. Perfect is “almost a good idea.” Very convincing but just does not make the grade.
  To the above post (Dana): I am afraid it sounds like your body is rejecting the implants. It is very unusual but blame YOUR immune system for the treatment failures. Uncontrolled or undiagnosed systemic diseases and disorders are the most likely culprit.

• Tim Miller October 23rd, 2009

  
  

  I have read about the sterility issues Nobel is having and I am concerned. Now a long time friend of mine in Canada, and a big Nobel client, has told me that Canada has recently or is prepared to recommended discontinuing the use of several Nobel products and that Nobel has threatened to sue. I want to look out for the safety of my patients and wonder if anyone in the US is discontinuing the use of NobelReplace implants? Jerry, I know you follow implant news closely, have you read anything?

  You know I switched back to Nobel about a year and a half ago. I was told about all this money they were going to spend on advertising and that in April of 2009 they would have TV commercials that would refer callers to local providers. This was the biggest reason I switched back. Well the commercials never materialized and I didn’t feel the high costs of Nobel was getting me a superior product. When I told my local Nobel sales rep I was going back to Implant Direct he was more than disappointed. He actually started arguing with me telling me he wouldn’t have an Implant Direct implant in his mouth. He told me Implant Direct were followers and Nobel was the leader, the innovators and that my patients would be getting an inferior product. Well I mentioned to him the 3.5mm NobelReplace failures and the NobelPerfect disappointment. I asked him if he really thought that the patients were getting the best from Nobel when they are releasing unproven products. I told him I’d rather go with proven designs that happen to cost one third the price.

  Dana, I’m sorry to hear about your situation. One individual having that many implants fail makes me want to further investigate your overall health. Have you had a thorough exam with blood work recently? I recommend you start there.

---

Leave a Comment

Comment Guidelines: This is a forum for dentists for intelligent discussion. No insults. No outside links. No promotional comments. Though we require an email to route questionable comments to our editors, we will NEVER publish your email. Consumers & Patients: Please do NOT post dental questions here. Instead Visit ChooseDentalImplants.com to get Expert Advice for Implants.

Name (required)

Email (Required, Will NEVER be published)

Website

Message:

Note: At times your comment may not appear on the website immediately, because it has been sent to our editors for approval. Once approved, we will publish the comment. There is NO need to resubmit your comment, if it does not appear on the website immediately.