Periodontal Disease: A Contraindication for Dental Implants?

Print This Post

Sarana, a dental patient from Texas, asks:

I am 50 years old, and have had periodontal disease for 20 years. I also developed rheumatoid arthritis about 12 years ago. 

I want to know if I am a candidate for dental implants even though I have had periodontal disease? Can I do a bone graft under these conditions? What are the success and failure rates for dental implants and bone grafts in a person with my conditons?

Free Daily Email Alert Click Here>>

Get OsseoNews.com Comments delivered daily! Click Here to subscribe.

10 Responses to “ Periodontal Disease: A Contraindication for Dental Implants? ”

• Dr. Fouda April 23rd, 2007

  
  

  No, periodontal disease isn’t a contra indication for dental implants.. it os a disease of cementum (the layer that covers the root) and the ligaments.. once the tooth is removed there is no periodontal disease .. there’s bone covered with a mucous membrane so it isn’t a gingiva.
  It is more safe to extract your teeth then do the implants after 2 month.. however immediate implants can be successfuly done too.

• Alejandro Berg April 24th, 2007

  
  

  There is no real problem if you are under control.Grafting and implants will have normal rates of success if done carefully.
  good luck

• Jackson April 25th, 2007

  
  

  If you think about it…. Who are our implant patients? Those with severe periodontal or biomechanical destruction. Luckily, implants are much more worried about force factors, micromotion, etc, than the perio pathogens present in normal amounts. Sinking an implant into pus isn’t smart, but controlling the perio while you place is actually very simple and quite predicatable.
  Good Luck,

  Jackson

• Dr. Mehdi Jafari April 26th, 2007

  
  

  The long-term prognosis of implants is as good in partially edentulous periodontally compromised patients as has been observed in long-term studies in the general population. It has been suggested that implants placed in partially edentulous patients are more at risk for bacterial colonization with a Perio-pathogenic micro-flora emerging from the periodontal pockets around diseased teeth in the same mouth. Some clinicians believe that partially edentulous patients with titanium implants will easily be colonized by putative periodontal pathogens in contrast to fully edentulous patients. However, if a destruction of the marginal bone around the implants occurs, this does not seem to be solely related to the presence of a Perio-pathogenic microflora. It is rather the result of a complex interaction between the microorganisms and host factors, similar to what has been seen around natural teeth affected with destructive periodontitis. However, a past history of periodontitis may represent a significant risk factor for complications around implants in patients that have been treated for advanced periodontitis. Untreated periodontal disease and refractory periodontitis patients are at risk for complications and a regular maintenance program is essential to keep the periodontal and peri-implant tissues healthy.

• L. Scott Brooksby, DDS, DICOI April 29th, 2007

  
  

  While there is a lot of talk about bacterial causes of periodontal disease, after 27 years of practice, I am more and more convinced that the surface of the tooth becomes contaminated in a way that the body begins to treat the tooth as a foreign body. If this is the case, and it may or may not be, then the removal of the tooth with later replacement by an implant should be as successful as implant placement for many other reasons.

  In my opinion, implants are reasonable replacements for teeth that need periodontal treatment, root canals or in many place crowns.

• Dr. Mehdi Jafari May 24th, 2007

  
  

  Studies have yielded inconsistent answers to the question of whether susceptibility to periodontitis affects implant treatment outcome. In one systematic review, from an initial list of 2,116 papers, 547 abstracts were examined, 49 full-text arti- cles were studied, and 2 were ?nally included in the review. One study of 346 implants in 97 partially-dentate patients iden- ti?ed de?nite periodontitis and non-periodontitis groups, each of 25 subjects with respectively 100 and 92 implants. The other study, of 112 implants in 53 patients, yielded respective groups of 8 and 45 patients. At 5 yrs in the ?rst study, 7 patients lost 8 implants in the periodontitis group, and 3 control patients lost 3 implants. In the second study, just one implant was lost, in the control group. These differences were not statistically signi?cant. The only sig- ni?cant differences were that more periodontitis patients had peri-implantitis and greater peri-implant bone loss.

• Mary June 23rd, 2007

  
  

  In the past I was hospitalized for MRSA. This was three and a half years ago. I have had RA for several years. I have regular dental cleanings every three to four months, and am seriously considering three dental implants in an area where one tooth is suffering resorption and another has decay well below the gum line. These teeth need to be extracted. I was wondering if I face any special challenges with the implants given my medical history. I understand that if a staff infection flares up again it can compromise areas where there is metal in the body. At the time I had the staff I was on immune suppressant medication. I am no longer on anything that dampens the immune system now or since the hospitalization. Given this fact, what are my chances for safety w/ the implants? Thanks. Mary

• johndds July 25th, 2007

  
  

  Scott Brooksby DDS wrote

  While there is a lot of talk about bacterial causes of periodontal disease, after 27 years of practice, I am more and more convinced that the surface of the tooth becomes contaminated in a way that the body begins to treat the tooth as a foreign body. If this is the case, and it may or may not be, then the removal of the tooth with later replacement by an implant should be as successful as implant placement for many other reasons.

  In my opinion, implants are reasonable replacements for teeth that need periodontal treatment, root canals or in many place crowns.

  I’M GOING TO HAVE TO DISAGREE PEOPLE ARE MEANT TO KEEP THEIR TEETH. WE HAVE LANAP WITHIN THE STANDARD OF CARE THAT ALLOWS US TO REVERSE PERIODONTAL DISEASE.

• johndds October 10th, 2007

  
  

  SeaMentum Says on another thread

  http://www.osseonews.com/bridge-or-implant/

  If you ask 10 dentists you’ll get ten different answers. Laser treatment is questionable at best according to published, peer-reviewed articles but some clinicians swear by it.

  sementum

  You wrote that on another thread.

  Why do you continue to doubt your own results?

  I do not get it? Are you a Periolase owner or not?

  If you are not, please retract your statements!

• johndds October 10th, 2007

  
  

  OOPs that post was meant for another thread please disregard. I can not delete or edit it.

  Sorry

  It was meant for this thread

  http://www.osseonews.com/cadaver-bone-for-grafting/#comment-17738

---

Leave a Comment

Note: Please refrain from ad hominem attacks, and promotional comments. Outside links are not permitted in comments. Though we require an email to route questionable comments to our editors, we will NEVER publish your email or use it for any other purpose. Thank you for your understanding.

Name (required)

Email (Required, Will NEVER be published)

Website

Note: At times your comment may not appear on the website immediately, because it has been sent to our editors for approval. Once approved, we will publish the comment. There is NO need to resubmit your comment, if it does not appear on the website immediately.

Wed August 20 2008

FREE Weekly Email

Keep current on the latest dental implant discussions! It's Free!

>>Click Here to Subscribe to OsseoNews.com Now!

---

---

Sponsor