Thoughts on CTX for surgery?

Using the CTX test as a guide to bone surgery has been controversial. What is the current thinking on the validity of this test? I have a patient with a CTX value of 66 and peri-implantitis. She needs surgical care but I don’t think that will be possible with this CTX value. Thoughts?

About CTx (from Human bone is continuously remodeled through a process of bone formation and resorption. Approximately 90% of the organic matrix of bone is type I collagen, a helical protein that is crosslinked at the N- and C-terminal ends of the molecule. During bone resorption, osteoclasts secrete a mixture of acid and neutral proteases that degrade the collagen fibrils into molecular fragments including C-terminal telopeptide (CTx). As bone ages, the alpha form of aspartic acid present in CTx converts to the beta form. Beta-CTx is released into the bloodstream during bone resorption and serves as a specific marker for the degradation of mature type I collagen. Elevated serum concentrations of beta-CTx have been reported in patients with increased bone resorption...Elevated levels of beta-C-terminal telopeptide (CTx) indicate increased bone resorption. Increased levels are associated with osteoporosis, osteopenia, Paget disease, hyperthyroidism, and hyperparathyroidism. In patients taking antiresorptive agents (bisphosphonates or hormone replacement therapy), a decrease of 25% or more from baseline beta-CTx levels (ie, prior to the start of therapy) 3 to 6 months after initiation of therapy indicates an adequate therapeutic response.

4 Comments on Thoughts on CTX for surgery?

New comments are currently closed for this post.
Dr. Sam
Very interesting question. I'm not sure what you mean by controversial per se, as I think recent studies have shown that Ctx is not all that helpful. See: Value of pre-operative CTX serum levels in the prediction of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): a retrospective clinical study. EPMA J. 2019 Jan 24;10(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s13167-019-0160-3. eCollection 2019 Mar. > Serum levels of CTX by itself are not reliable as a predictive or preventive measure for such complications. Also this: Is serum C-terminal telopeptide cross-link of type 1 collagen a reliable parameter for predicting the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws? A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Clin Oral Investig . 2022 Mar;26(3):2371-2382. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04383-3. Epub 2022 Feb 6. > sCTX should not be considered a reliable preoperative marker to predict MRONJ development.
Francis Serio
Dr. Sam, Many thanks for this detailed response. Is there any other test/way to estimate the potential for MRONJ after extraction, bone exposure due to flap elevation, etc.
Dr. Sam
@francisserio I believe panoramic radiographs can be analyzed for signs. An Oral and maxillofacial radiologist should be consulted for potentially high risk cases. I don't think a CTx test is useless, btw. It's just that using just a CTx test alone, doesn't seem to offer any predictive value based on recent studies. However, see: Do various imaging modalities provide potential early detection and diagnosis of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw? A review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol . 2021 Sep 1;50(6):20200417. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200417. Epub 2021 Jan 15. > "Currently, no clear diagnostic criteria exist to assess MRONJ, and the definitive diagnosis solely relies on clinical bone exposure...Currently, MRONJ-specific imaging features cannot be firmly established. However, the current data are valuable as it may lead to a more efficient diagnostic procedure along with a more suitable selection of imaging modalities."
Thanks for the comments. I think we can close this.