Which is better: implantation first or extract first?
Last Updated: Feb 18, 2016
I have treatment planned this patient for extraction #15 and 18 and crown on #20 and implant in #19 site followed by a crown. In terms of treatment sequence, should I extract #15 and 18 first, and then place #19? Or should I first place #19 implant and then later extract #18? I have heard that this may conserve bone around the implant. On the other hand, I am concerned that the extraction of #18 may damage the bone around #19 site because this patient has very dense bone and the extraction may be difficult. I am also concerned that if I place the implant first, I may damage the implant when I extract #18. What do you recommend?
11 Comments on Which is better: implantation first or extract first?
peterFairbairn
02/19/2016
greg steiner
02/19/2016
Dr. T
02/19/2016
Alex Zavyalov
02/20/2016
Daniel Camm
02/23/2016
Dr Gilani
02/23/2016
Gregori Kurtzman, DDS, MA
02/23/2016
Eric Katch
02/24/2016
mpedds
02/25/2016
Amit Binderman
02/25/2016
Featured Products
Classic 50/50 Mix
Promotes osteoconduction
Provides structural integrity
Convenient Syringe!
50/50 Cortical/Cancellous
Available in 3 sizes.
Eliminate hassle of mixing particulate grafts
Sold in packs of 5 or packs of 10.
Proven safe, and clinically effective
Resorbable collagen membrane derived from purified porcine pericardium
Fast hydration and excellent tensile strength
Good adaptation to various defects
Excellent tear function and duration
100% allograft
Eliminates mixing hassle
Moldable after hydration
CRS
02/19/2016