Osseo News Logo

The Original Dental Implant Community

Sign In

Peri-implantitis surface decontamination: which method?

Last Updated: Apr 03, 2017

One of the often cited complications of dental implants, which may lead to loss of the implant in the long term, is peri-implantitis. Peri-implantitis has been defined as an inflammatory lesion of the tissues surrounding the implant subjected to functional loading, with a loss of supporting bone. Two popular physical decontamination methods used to treat/prevent peri-implantitis, are the mechanical removal of biofilm from the implant surface using curettes or decontamination using a Laser. Laser decontamination is based on its thermal effect, which denatures proteins and causes cellular necrosis.

But which method produces better results? A recent study assessed the long-term outcomes (>4 years) following combined surgical resective/regenerative therapy of advanced peri-implantitis lesions using either (i) an Er:YAG laser (ERL) or (ii) plastic curettes + cotton pellets + sterile saline (CPS).

The conclusion:

At 7 years, both ERL and CPS were associated with similar mean bleeding on probing reductions (CPS: 89.99 ± 11.65% versus ERL: 86.66 ± 18.26%) and clinical attachment level gains (CPS: 2.76 ± 1.92 mm versus ERL: 2.06 ± 2.52 mm). Combined surgical resective/regenerative therapy of advanced peri-implantitis was effective on the long-term, but not influenced by the initial method of surface decontamination.1

Read the Full Abstract Here

1\. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Mar;44(3):337-342. [Combined surgical therapy of advanced peri-implantitis evaluating two methods of surface decontamination: a 7-year follow-up observation](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28101947) Schwarz F et al.

2 Comments on Peri-implantitis surface decontamination: which method?

Greg Kammeyer

04/05/2017

Read the 2 case series reports by Stewart Froum et al, in the Int J Perio and Restor Dent. He advocates a multi-step process that works quite well. 4 rounds of Air abrasion with chemical treatments between them Citric Acid, CHX,. EDTA. Beyond that he uses a growth factor, GBR, and CTG to help restore the defect. As I read the literature this is the most consistent protocol when treating a larger (relative to the published literature) sample and a significant number of cases. Happily it also doesn't require the cost of a laser that may gather dust between cases.

Dennis Flanagan DDS MSc

04/05/2017

All the detoxifying agents are bacteriocidal to a portion of the colony. Thus it may be best to use several agents, bleach (dilute), citric acid, tetracycline, CaOH, NaHCO3 spray, EDTA. It may be beneficial to leave the CaOH or minocycline microspheres in the site.

Featured Products

DALI Bone Mix

DALI Bone Mix

The highest quality tissue!

Classic

Classic 50/50 Mix

Promotes osteoconduction

Provides structural integrity

DALI Bone Syringe

DALI Bone Syringe

Prefilled Mineralized Cortico-Cancellous Bone in Syringe

New

Convenient Syringe!

50/50 Cortical/Cancellous

Available in 3 sizes.

Osteogen Plug

Osteogen Plug

Combines bone graft with a collagen plug.

Classic

Eliminate hassle of mixing particulate grafts

Sold in packs of 5 or packs of 10.

Proven safe, and clinically effective

OsseoSeal Flexible Membrane

OsseoSeal Flexible Membrane

Resorbable collagen membrane derived from purified porcine pericardium

Popular

Fast hydration and excellent tensile strength

Good adaptation to various defects

Excellent tear function and duration

DALI One Graft

DALI One Graft

One-Step grafting solution!

New

100% allograft

Eliminates mixing hassle

Moldable after hydration