Pressed Ceramic Restorations vs. Feldspathic Porcelain: What is Better?
Last Updated: Jan 02, 2009
Anon asks:
What is a ‘pressed ceramic’ restoration? How is this different from feldspathic porcelain? I keep hearing lecturers voice their support for one of these kinds of porcelain but I do not understand what is so important? Is one more aesthetic than the other? Is one stronger than the other? Are there specific indications for each of these different kinds of porcelain? Should I be choosing one of these for certain kinds of ceramic restorations? Would my lab know about the difference?
8 Comments on Pressed Ceramic Restorations vs. Feldspathic Porcelain: What is Better?
Mark Jackson
01/06/2009
Mark Jackson, RDT
01/06/2009
Mike Stanley, asst.
01/06/2009
Carrie van Deventer
08/19/2009
AKSHAY BHARGAVA
08/28/2010
Amoori
02/10/2011
JC
02/10/2011
Featured Products
Classic 50/50 Mix
Promotes osteoconduction
Provides structural integrity
Convenient Syringe!
50/50 Cortical/Cancellous
Available in 3 sizes.
Eliminate hassle of mixing particulate grafts
Sold in packs of 5 or packs of 10.
Proven safe, and clinically effective
Resorbable collagen membrane derived from purified porcine pericardium
Fast hydration and excellent tensile strength
Good adaptation to various defects
Excellent tear function and duration
100% allograft
Eliminates mixing hassle
Moldable after hydration
David Hall, DDS
01/06/2009