Bone vs. Titanium: Are Wider Implants Justified?
Last Updated: Aug 03, 2010
Dr. IR, a general dentist, asks:
I just went to the Florida Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons meeting. One speaker discussed bone grafting and why it is so important to have more bone instead of more titanium. It is much healthier to have more fibrovascular tissue to grow around the implant surface than to have extra titanium in a wider or longer implant fixture. This will help with more blood flow which in turn will help with more bone growth which in turn will help promote osseointegration and maintain implant and bone health. However, some implant companies are advising dentists to use 8mm and 9 mm diameter implants in very wide extraction or osteotomy sites instead of doing bone grafts. The speaker was adamant that everyone should be placing the smallest possible implants and doing whatever bone grafting as necessary. Any thoughts on this?
16 Comments on Bone vs. Titanium: Are Wider Implants Justified?
Marcus
08/03/2010
Carlos Boudet, DDS
08/03/2010
Terence Lau, DDS
08/04/2010
Dr. Danesh from Iran
08/05/2010
robert56
08/05/2010
bahram
08/07/2010
Marshall S. Dicker DMD FA
08/07/2010
Satish Bhardwaj
08/18/2010
arizona dentist
08/22/2010
JonH
11/12/2010
Shirley A . Colby
11/12/2010
K. F. Chow BDS., FDSRCS
11/16/2010
Robert Muller
07/25/2011
Robert J. Miller
07/25/2011
Richard Hughes, DDS, FAAI
07/26/2011
Featured Products
Classic 50/50 Mix
Promotes osteoconduction
Provides structural integrity
Convenient Syringe!
50/50 Cortical/Cancellous
Available in 3 sizes.
Eliminate hassle of mixing particulate grafts
Sold in packs of 5 or packs of 10.
Proven safe, and clinically effective
Resorbable collagen membrane derived from purified porcine pericardium
Fast hydration and excellent tensile strength
Good adaptation to various defects
Excellent tear function and duration
100% allograft
Eliminates mixing hassle
Moldable after hydration
periodoc
08/03/2010