Large defect at extraction site: best way to approach this?

I extracted a maxillary second premolar [maxillary second bicuspid] and in order to promote healing in the extraction site I placed a bone graft and covered with a titanium reinforced membrane. Â One of the vertical releasing incisions failed to close and exposed the membrane. Â I then removed the membrane and graft and let the site heal. Â There is a large defect (concavity) at the site. Â I am planning on going back into the site in 6 to 8 weeks and attempting another graft and covering with a resorbable collagen membrane. Â Is this the best way to approach this problem? Â Any other recommendations?

10 Comments on Large defect at extraction site: best way to approach this?

New comments are currently closed for this post.
Robert J. Miller
10/10/2012
Without any additional information about your procedure, the one area I find most difficult to control is vertical releasing incisions, especially when they are close to the grafted site. I can get almost identical results using a wide range of graft materials or types of membranes/barriers. However, singularly, the number one cause of failure of grafts is failure to achieve primary closure for the required healing time, or dehisence of the flap. Wide flaps that extend several teeth from the grafted area, adequate flap advancement, and atraumatic healing are the best ways to ensure adequate healing. Additionally, you can add a biologic such as L-PRF to get faster soft tissue closure. A resorbale membrane without retention of shape/volume, even with good primary closure, will result in additional collapse of volume during the catabolic (resorptive) phase. Try the same technique, but this time with a different approach to raising your flaps. RJM
CHOUKROUN Joseph
11/10/2012
Dr Robert Miller, what is exactly L-PRF ? Have" you published already ? Is it new invention from Intra-lock or new marketing from Intra-Lock ? I never published any article about L-PRF. you induce lot of confusion.. By chance , I read your comments in the osseonews blog. It' s unbelievable how you can give feedback completely wrong !!. I believe that you do not understand yet as well the biology and specially the PRF , if you can comment the protocol like this. You said that you have no ties..! you are share holder of Intra-lock.!! and you have a very big conflict of interest if you present yourself only as a "practitionner"; Your comments are only to attract people to the Intra-lock brand. If you do not understand as well the protocol, please avoid the comments. You misled the readers. Please leave the PRF to specialists. Joseph CHOUKROUN
greg steiner
10/10/2012
No regenerative procedure is successful 100% of the time. But as Dr Miller has correctly noted " ...the number one cause of failure of grafts is failure to achieve primary closure for the required healing time, or dehiscence of the flap." For this reason we have developed flapless socket grafting. Greg Steiner Steiner Laboratories
CRS
10/11/2012
I am going to assume there was no buccal plate hence the need for a membrane. The "trick" to a vertical releasing incision is undermining and advancing the flap to allow closure. If a small amount of teflon membrane is exposed you watch it and allow the tissue to granulate under it, removing it probably disturbed the graft. Now you have burned a bridge. The defect can be corrected with an onlay graft either solid block or particulate with growth factors. Now you REALLY need to be able to advance a flap with primary closure since this didn't happen the first time, please do the right thing and refer it to someone who can do this, even better go watch the surgery! I don't like flapless techniques since you are only guessing as to the quality or quantity of buccal plate, you need to see it. I agree with RJM however, going in a second time with the same skill set is not in the patient's best interests.
Dr Mario Marcone
10/13/2012
Dear Colleague, Incision line opening is one of the most frequent, if not the most frequent, of post-surgical "complications". In order to minimize the occurence of this complication, proper flap management and the understanding of proper flap design is imperative. In addition, the pre-operative clinical and biologic state of the surgical site, needs to be understood in order to make the proper pre-operative tentative decisions about applications of the proper surgical and biological regenerative materials and techniques. The scientific literature is varied and rich with such information. All that being said, there are several biologically enhancing materials available, and, Choukroun's PRF is an excellent choice; however, these materials assume that proper surgical technique is administered. Take home message: If we are going to do this science in the clinical setting, let's be sure that we know how to troubleshoot the possible complications. To do this stuff, you can get away with only needing a recipe. To troubleshoot, however, you better know your science and the scientific literature. Good Luck. Dr Mario Marcone Montreal, Canada
CRS
10/14/2012
Well said Dr Marcone.
Baker k. Vinci
10/17/2012
This is why I discourage the vertical release, however if it must be done, it should be so far away from the surgical site that it doesn't matter if it breaks down. Let us see some images. I bet if you wait three months, you will find that there is enough bone to proceed. Your first procedure " failed", so let nature take its place. You can always augment the buccal aspect of your implant, it the bony topography is not perfect at the time of placement . Bvinci
MICHAEL VO
10/20/2012
I think to wait 6-8 weeks and go back is a good plan. I would see the patient a few days prior to the surgery to make sure the gum will be healthy and will allow you to obtain primary closure this time. A gum grafting might be required prior to a new bone graft depending on what you have. A collagen membrane alone is a good option depending on the type and the extent of the defect. I agree with Dr Miller. The result does not depend on the type of membrane you use, but rather on your understanding of guided bone regeneration. Beware, failure with resorbable collagen membrane can lead to severe bone loss and headaches. Sometimes, it is better for our patient, our sleep, our reputation and our wallet to refer out a colleague who can do GBR. Good luck.
Brent
10/20/2012
Thanks to everyone that replied I appreciate all of your thoughts Brent
Carlo santos
11/8/2012
Hi, well make your flap wider and releasing inscision longer, (given that you have placed and secured your membrane and biomaterial in the surgical site)' de-epethilialize, both ends of your flap, so that good coaptation will occur, also with proper width and hight of the flap do a Burgers flap, in which once again you deepithilialize the edges of your gingive to be sutured, blood should ooze a little upon closure... Witha good pressure gauze pack, followed by the clot, your good to go:)

Featured Products

OsteoGen Bone Grafting Plug
Combines bone graft with a collagen plug to yield the easiest and most affordable way to clinically deliver bone graft for socket preservation.
CevOss Bovine Bone Graft
Make the switch to a better xenograft! High volume of interconnected pores promotes new bone. Substantially equivalent to BioOss and NuOss.