Immediate vs. Delayed Loading?

Dr. Cal. asks:

I have just read: Immediate versus delayed functional loading of
implants in the posterior mandible – A 2-year prospective clinical
study of 12 consecutive cases (Romanos G., Nentwig G-H. Int. J. of
Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry; 2006:26:459-469

The bottom line here is that after 2-years in the posterior mandible, there was basically no difference between the dental implants which had a 3-month osseointegration followed by restoration versus immediate loading of the dental implants! In this study, 3 dental implants were placed in the posterior mandible and splinted together. Have any of you out there done this sort of immediate load and what were your results? Do you see a difference? Any thoughts on immediate vs delayed would be appreciated.

5 thoughts on “Immediate vs. Delayed Loading?

  1. Anonymous says:

    Would not base any thoughts from that study with such a small sample size. More and more information is coming out that immediate loading has about the same success rate as the traditional route. However, no great consensus on when immediate loading should take place ? For example, immediate load an implant that is stable at only 5 Ncm ? Load at 20Ncm of initial stability ? Temporary completely out of occlusion and all excursional interferences or load in light axial occlusion only? Osseointegration has similar properties to healing of fractures. Movement leads to non-union and fibrous unions. So unless I can be sure movement is eliminated or very minimal, I don’t immediately load.

  2. Jimmy Kilimitzoglou says:

    I have good success with immediate “load” in the anterior and selected esthetically demanding premolar sites. The protocol is if the implant has primary fixation of greater than 30-35Ncm then the implant can be immediately temporized. The temp is out of occlusion and no lateral or protrusive contact. The patient is on a modified soft diet until the osseointegration is complete (6 months in maxilla and grafted bone, 4 months in mandible). I personaly do not feel comfortable temporizing 1-3 posterior units because it is hard to control the load. Moreover, the implants tend to be in a straight line so there is no cross stabilization. Patients will inevitably bite on the temporary and the posterior mandible experiences greater force compared to anterior sites. If however there is cross arch stabilization with 6 implants for example, I feel comfortable loading the case because of the splinting effect and the even distribution of the masticatory forces. I think that this is a safe protocol and I realize that there is research that supports immediate loading even in the posterior mandible and maxilla.

  3. Dr. Tenax says:

    Somborac published a paper in the October 2002 issue of ORAL HEALTH titled “Implants For Overdenture Retention; Immediate Insertion Treatment Compared to Delayed Insertion Treatment”. 62 patients were treated for overdenture retention with a total of 186 implants and followed from March of 1996 to March of 2002. The survival experiences of the two groups were compared with the Kaplan-Maier method. The survival of the implants in the Delayed Group was 94.8% versus a 98.9% survival of the Immediate Group. (Chi-square = 1.2; p = 0.27).


Comments are closed.

Posted in Immediate Loading.
Bookmark Immediate vs. Delayed Loading?

Videos to Watch:

Lateral Sinus Lift: Perforation, Repair, and Implants

These two videos demonstrate the lateral window sinus technique, and implant placement following the repair[...]

Watch Now!
Single Tooth Replacement with Implants in the Esthetic Zone

Dr. Jack Hahn provides tips and reviews cases for implant placement in the esthetic zone.[...]

Watch Now!
Surgical Consideration for the Flapless Approach

In this video, Dr. Jack Hahn discusses and presents cases to review the surgical considerations[...]

Watch Now!
Bond Apatite: Socket Preservation Cases

These 2 videos show the use of Bond Apatite in socket preservation cases, one with[...]

Watch Now!
3D Guided Implant Placement

The placement of multiple implants in this case was helped thru the use of 3d[...]

Watch Now!
Ridge Splitting Cases in Narrow Alveolar ridge

This videos shows ridge splitting, which when combined with bone expansion, is an effective technique[...]

Watch Now!
Placement of 4 Implants and Cement-Retained Bridge

The treatment plan was to extract the lower incisors, canines, and lower premolar and place[...]

Watch Now!
Failing Bridge Replaced with Dental Implant Supported Bridge

Ahe patient presented with a failed dental bridge from the upper right canine to the[...]

Watch Now!
Lateral Sinus Augmentation with CGF

Following membrane elevation with the lateral approach, and confirmation of an intact sinus membrane, concentrated[...]

Watch Now!
Titanium Mesh for Ridge Augmentation

The use of titanium mesh is a reliable method for ridge augmentation to provide adequate[...]


Watch Now!
Implant Grafting Techniques: Demineralized Sponge Strip and Tunneling

This video reviews several unique grafting and surgical techniques, including the use of demineralized cancellous[...]

Watch Now!
Mandibular Fixed Screw Retained Restoration

This video shows the use of a surgical guide for a mandibular fixed screw retained[...]

1 Comment

Watch Now!